There exist some open minded editors of journals who have published without hesitation the findings of  our research in Materials Science and Microbiology.

Four papers have been published and around 40 papers are under process of consideration

A person suffering from chronic malady or yet to be diagnosed disease is least interested whether a methodology of cure is scientifically proved or established. Rather, he would jump at the opportunity when a cure is available and get himself treated. Science has always lagged behind innovations or technology. The scientists are only good at analyzing the causes after the event has occurred and keep themselves busy with the views and counter views. How many times the great innovations in science have been delayed for several years as these are refused to be published by Journals for want of acceptance by peer group and other reasons? How many clinics repeat the results of various pathological tests for statistical significance before reporting results of a patient's blood or urine or biopsy? Scientists hide behind a fortress of rules, regulations, methodology, and statistics and are isolated from society contributing to isolated thinking and tunnel vision.
 
Enrico Fermi's breakthrough paper on the weak interaction theory of beta decay, and, Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield's Nobel Prize winning paper in Physiology/ Medicine were rejected by 'Nature'. When his paper was sent for peer review by 'Physical Review', Einstein got annoyed and wrote "We (Mr. Rosen and I) had sent you our manuscript for publication and had not authorized you to show it to specialists before it is printed. I see no reason to address the - in any case erroneous - comments of your anonymous expert. On the basis of this incident I prefer to publish the paper elsewhere". After this incident, Einstein vowed never again to publish in— 'Physical Review' and he didn't. The Einstein-Rosen paper eventually appeared in the 'Journal of the Franklin Institute'.
 
The so called rationalists often criticize religions for adhering to dogmas, rituals, narrow thinking and regimentation. In what manner the present day scientists, editors of Journals along with their peer reviewers are different? Are they the universal experts and in a position to judge the unknown? They can at best point out the logic, formatting and grammatical mistakes. There are plenty of data available in nature as well as from scientific experiments, if only one can keep an open mind and try to understand what these are revealing. But the dogmas, rituals, narrow thinking and regimentation afflicting the current scientists and scientific associations and their journals are driving away the scientists with fresh and visionary approaches signaling the death knell of science.
 
There are several examples even in the current times where the visionary scientists are driven to desperation and thanks to internet technology now they are able to express their views through individual web sites there by exposing the shallowness of the scientific community. Typical examples are the epigenetics of Bruce Lipton, epistemology of Henry Margenau, theoretical aspects of consciousness of Matti Ptikanen, etc., and, now Mr. Trivedi's transcendental science- Science inked with consciousness. When Mr. Trivedi has caused significant changes in gene morphology as well as in isotope abundance of carbon amongst several other miracles, the Journals, instead of exploring the causes and effects are as expected hiding behind the so called fortress.  
   
The results obtained on control and blessed samples are analyzed and  compiled in the form of over 40 scientific papers and communicated to various Journals in the fields Materials science, Medicine, Microbiology and Alternative and complementary medicine, etc,. Some of these are returned promptly from editor's desk itself. It is rather surprising! On the one hand the scientists pretend to be rational and go after challenging various Gurus, God men and Healers and on the other hand hide behind silly excuses when Mr. Trivedi has confronted them with scientific proof of his miracles. He has precisely anticipated this as science has deviated long ago from spirituality and the concept of the energy that created the cosmos and hence science. The rejection of technical papers by journals is an expected reaction and is a first step in the right direction of establishing Mr. Trivedi's Transcendental Science- the science linked with consciousness.